Feed on
Posts
Comments

AOPA 2007: User Fees, Flight Service Among Topics At General Session
Sun, 07 Oct ‘07
Boyer Delivers ‘State Of The Union’ Concerning Funding Debate
by ANN Correspondent Dave Ziegler

AOPA President Phil Boyer spent the lion’s share of Saturday’s general session on the status of the user fees for General Aviation debate. Despite recent victories for GA, Boyer warned that the fight isn’t over yet. “We’re in the Terminal Area, we are within site of the airport, but there is some convective weather ahead, and that’s probably the best way to describe where we are right now.”

After displaying several anti-GA advertisements currently found on airport terminal televisions, airline seatbacks, and newspapers throughout the country, Boyer shared counter-ads produced by the Alliance for Aviation Across America (AAAA) and funded by the AOPA and NBAA. These responses highlight DOT studies that claim most delays are caused by weather and the commercial airlines themselves. “The airlines would have you believe that General Aviation is the cause for all the delays at the major airports,” explained Boyer. “In fact, we’re only 4% of the traffic at the top 10 airports.”

Speaking about General Aviation’s most recent victory in the House of Representatives, Boyer said that “on that side of Capitol Hill, they passed the House bill that we support by 267 to 151.” H.R. 2881, or the FAA Reauthorization Act of 2007, passed on September 20th with no mention of user fees, but instead includes a small tax increase on AvGas and a slightly larger tax increase on turbine fuel.

The Senate Commerce Committee had previously passed its own bill which included user fees for turbine aircraft and a 100% increase on the turbine fuel tax and eliminated the only aviation tax paid by the airlines. “In effect, the Senate Finance Committee rejected their ideas, changed the taxes keeping the airline fuel tax … and kept our GA taxes at a reasonable level.”

In its current state, however, the bill still contains a $25 user fee for turbine aircraft. “We hope to be able to take care of that in a different kind of way,” said Boyer, who hopes for an amendment to remove the user fee during a full Senate vote. Afterwards, a Conference committee will bring both bills together and send the finalized bill to the White House to be vetoed or signed by the President.

Cebula Discusses FSS Outsourcing

A quick and informal poll of Saturday’s general session audience by Andy Cebula, AOPA Executive Vice President of Government Affairs, revealed most attendees who utilized the Lockheed Martin Automated Flight Service Station system in the last six months have had problems. “We know it,” responded Cebula, “and we have been doing a great deal of work on this because it has been a real frustration for us as an organization to see how this has just fallen apart and not really served your needs.

According to Cebula, modernization of the old AFSS system — which utilized 1970s technology — would result in $2 billion in savings. “If we would have stayed with this current system, our fear is that you’d be paying about $9 a gallon, and that would look just like Europe.”

Despite problems with the current FSS system, Cebula acknowledged that outsourcing was still the right decision, and he assured members that the AOPA would continue to monitor and demand action to correct outstanding issues, saying that the AOPA has been, and will remain, in communication with the FAA and Lockheed Martin on a daily basis. One of the biggest problems still facing pilots is lack of local area knowledge by briefers.

To help pilots, AOPA introduced a briefing tips card that can help pilots navigate their way through the new system to find a briefer in their area. The cards were handed out at AOPA Expo and will be made available in the November issue of AOPA Pilot and the December issue of AOPA Flight Training.

New AOPA Website, Air Safety Foundation Offerings

Acting in her new role of AOPA Executive Vice President of Communications, Karen Gebhart introduced AOPA’s new web site, which went live on September 19th. The completely redesigned site utilizes newer web technologies for richer content and takes into consideration the many suggestions offered by AOPA members, including more non-advocacy news coverage, better organization, and improved readability.

Also new for AOPA members is a whole new safety seminar from the Air Safety Foundation, presented during the general session by ASF Executive Director Bruce Landsberg. The new seminar, which made its debut at AOPA Expo 2007, discusses the top five ways GA pilots end up in fatal accidents, and what you can do to avoid making the same mistakes.

The ASF also offers a new online course for owners and operators of aging aircraft. This interactive course discusses factors that affect the rate of aging, such as storage, use, abuse, and maintenance. It also offers suggestions for proactive inspection and maintenance practices, and explains the difference between chronological and true age. More information on both of these offerings can be found on the Air Safety Foundation website.

FMI: http://www.aopa.org/, http://www.asf.org/

AOPA 2007: Embraer Touts Its Light Jets At Hartford
Fri, 05 Oct ‘07
Brazilian Planemaker “Particularly Pleased” With Response
by ANN Correspondent Dave Ziegler

AOPA Expo attendees will be able to take an early look at the Embraer Phenom 300’s new extended cabin by visiting the company’s full-scale mock-up at the AOPA Expo Aircraft Display, located at Hartford-Brainard Airport.

“This is only the second time we have shown the new extended cabin of the Phenom 300 in North America,” said Ernest Edwards, Embraer Vice President, Marketing & Sales — USA, Canada, Mexico and the Caribbean, Executive Jets, adding that so far the company is “particularly pleased with the response it’s getting.”

Targeted towards corporations now flying large turboprops and smaller light jets, air taxi and charter companies, and individual owners, the Phenom 100 and 300 are single-pilot-capable aircraft designed with short-field takeoff and hot and high operations in mind. Both jets will offer a standard anti-skid brake-by-wire system for added safety and reliability.

Two Pratt & Whitney Canada PW617F engines, with 1,615 pounds of thrust each, power the jet. Its range with four occupants will be 1,160 nautical miles (2,148 km or 1,335 miles) with NBAA IFR reserves, 35 minutes, and 100 nm alternate; or 1,320 nautical miles (2,445 km or 1,519 miles) with NBAA VFR reserves, 45 minutes.

The aircraft is capable of flying at 41,000 feet (12,497 meters) at a maximum operating speed of Mach 0.70. These characteristics will allow customers to fly nonstop from New York to Miami; and from Los Angeles to Denver or Vancouver (Canada) at a lower cost than competitive aircraft, including turboprops.

The Phenom features the Prodigy flight deck, based on Garmin’s all-glass, fully-integrated avionics suite. The Prodigy flight deck consists of three interchangeable 12-inch displays: Two Primary Flight Displays (PFD) and one Multi-Function Display (MFD). The system integrates all primary flight, navigation, communication, terrain, traffic, weather, engine instrumentation, and crew-alerting system data and presents the composite information in brilliant, sunlight-readable color on all three high-definition displays.

Designed by BMW Group Designworks USA, the Phenom’s interior is boasts such amenities as an onboard wardrobe or refreshment center, an aft cabin private lavatory with toiletry cabinet, and satellite communications. In a typical club configuration, the Phenom 100 accommodates four passengers and features a 55-cubic-foot (1.56-cubic-meter) baggage compartment.

The Phenom 100 is priced at US$ 2.98 million, based on January 2005 economic conditions, in the baseline configuration, for FAA certification. The aircraft’s maiden flight took place last July, and the jet is currently carrying out the certification flight test campaign in order to enter service in mid-2008.

After AOPA Expo 2007, the Phenom mock-up tour continues to the US cities of St. Louis, Shreveport, Houston, Austin, Dallas-Ft. Worth, Oklahoma City and Tulsa. A complete calendar of the tour is available from Embraer’s web site.

FMI: http://www.embraerexecutivejets.com/

AOPA 2007: Mooney Stakes Claim On Fastest Single Title With Acclaim Type ‘S’
Fri, 05 Oct ‘07
Announces “Mooney Mania” Incentive Program
by ANN Correspondent Dave Ziegler

On the opening day of AOPA Expo, Mooney Aircraft Company reasserted its claim for the world’s fastest piston single. “We can at last, completely and finally, put to rest any debate about what piston single-engine airplane is the fastest: It’s the Mooney Acclaim, or to be more specific and precise, the new Mooney Acclaim Type S,” said David Copeland, Mooney’s vice president of sales and marketing.

“We’ve added more than a new designation to the Acclaim; we’ve dramatically increased its top speed,” Copeland explained. “The Type S truly stands for speed: 242 knots of speed, and increased range, all with the legendary aerodynamic purity that Mooney pilots appreciate.”

Powered by a 280 hp Teledyne Continental Motors IO 550-G engine equipped with dual Kelly Aerospace turbochargers, the Acclaim will maintain sea level manifold pressure all the way to its service ceiling of 25,000 feet. The new Acclaim Type S will also feature a custom Hartzell propeller and design enhancements that improve airflow and minimize drag, providing an additional 10 knots over the top speed of 232 knots originally published in the aircraft’s POH.

“Now there is no question about which airplane is faster,” Copeland (above) said in regard to Mooney’s closest speed competitor, the Columbia 400. “Columbia’s advertising, which has consistently claimed that the 400 is — or was — the fastest single is not only out of date, it’s out of bounds.”

Copeland also addressed the announcement of Cessna’s acquisition of Columbia.

“We at Mooney think that this development is a very positive one for Columbia and Cessna, as well as our industry as a whole. We believe that competition is healthy and an energizing force, and we welcome Cessna to the high-performance piston ranks.

“We’re sure they will be worthy adversaries, and we fully expect that they will correct any misconceptions posed by Columbia’s advertising as well,” Copeland pointedly added.

Priced at $599,500, deliveries of the Acclaim Type S are forecast to commence during the first quarter of 2008.

Mooney Airplane Company also announced today the launch of Mooney Mania, a program to recognize and reward its loyal customers. “[The program is] designed to give recognition to our very loyal and passionate Mooney owners, encourage potential first time Mooney buyers, and even catch the attention of existing Mooney owners of competitive aircraft.”

Under the new program, which runs until the end of the year, current Mooney owners will qualify to receive $1,000 in free fuel for each referral who signs a contract for and accepts delivery of a new Mooney aircraft.

Additionally, qualified buyers who finance their aircraft through Mooney Capital will be eligible for an interest rate of 4.99%, and Mooney will work with owners to sell their existing aircraft. Those who take advantage of this promotional rate can fly for free for 90 days with no payments due for the first three months.

“We’re out to make this last quarter of 2007 another one for the Mooney history books,” said Copeland.

Other incentives will be offered to Mooney owners who bring a friend to an upcoming Mooney Fall fly-in event, to be posted on Mooney’s website. Additionally, each week Mooney’s website will spotlight different loyal Mooney owners.

And just how loyal are Mooney owners? Ask “Mooniac” Arthur “Arty” Dowd… who will demonstrate his loyalty by getting a tattoo of the Mooney logo over his heart — right at the Mooney exhibit on day two of AOPA Expo.

FMI: www.mooney.com/

Below is my coverage of EAA AirVenture Oshkosh 2007 for Aero-News Network (ANN):

ANN Proudly Introduces Our AirVenture 2007 Staff - July 11th
http://www.aero-news.net/news/featurestories.cfm?ContentBlockID=3CA9DD18-0281-4DE6-A0D4-0A04C140F3EF&Dynamic=1

Bolster Your License To Learn At AirVenture 2007 - July 18th
http://www.aero-news.net/news/genav.cfm?ContentBlockID=71C4CDE8-CE97-4154-9C23-65A086E89738&Dynamic=1

Jumpstarting Your Aviation Career at AirVenture - July 23rd
http://www.aero-news.net/news/genav.cfm?ContentBlockID=7EA51EC3-7CF1-4316-BEF5-647730832658&Dynamic=1

Imaginations Soar At EAA AirVenture Oshkosh - July 23rd
http://www.aero-news.net/news/featurestories.cfm?ContentBlockID=BAAEF3A4-340B-4569-9A42-73937633415B&Dynamic=1

Aviat Aircraft, Forward Vision Announce Joint Venture At Oshkosh 2007 - July 24th
http://www.aero-news.net/news/genav.cfm?ContentBlockID=B2728FA2-F68D-4D1C-89A9-59E2947018D2&Dynamic=1

Columbia Aircraft Says 55 Planes Delivered In Q2 - July 25th
http://www.aero-news.net/news/genav.cfm?ContentBlockID=26BB5D7A-4C2E-4B08-9239-3198E0DE5085&Dynamic=1

Lightspeed Aviation Demonstrates New ‘Zulu’ Headset At Oshkosh - July 25th
http://www.aero-news.net/news/genav.cfm?ContentBlockID=3BFD09AE-90D5-45F9-864B-31A5DB60923A&Dynamic=1

Wings 2.0 — The New FAA Pilot Proficiency Program - July 26th
http://www.aero-news.net/news/genav.cfm?ContentBlockID=22A7D6B2-98E9-4BD6-A0E0-D90C84E08A15&Dynamic=1

Wings 2.0 — The New FAA Proficiency Program, Part II - July 27th
http://www.aero-news.net/news/featurestories.cfm?ContentBlockID=E105298A-0575-43BD-A309-8EB9C8D0D0CB&Dynamic=1

Why You Should Consider Becoming A Glider Pilot - July 27th
http://www.aero-news.net/news/sport.cfm?ContentBlockID=E8871AA3-A58C-414B-8148-EEBD2B5B8C44&Dynamic=1

Micco Aircraft Improves 2008 Production Aircraft - July 27th
http://www.aero-news.net/news/genav.cfm?ContentBlockID=9d2cd1ab-2397-4010-91a5-d8fb7f26acca&Dynamic=1

NAFI, IAC Announce Aerobatic Instructor Designation Program - July 29th
http://www.aero-news.net/news/sport.cfm?ContentBlockID=b789254b-e42f-401e-922f-714af544bf65&Dynamic=1

A Flight Back Into Aviation History… With a Very Special Stinson - August 4th
http://www.aero-news.net/news/genav.cfm?ContentBlockID=93dc03f6-69c1-4487-be2b-3f507b49e29e&Dynamic=1

Captain Jim Lovell Shares Experiences With AirVenture Crowd - August 4th
http://www.aero-news.net/news/featurestories.cfm?ContentBlockID=f479f9db-2f85-449c-9977-f5f21219ba07&Dynamic=1

An Oshkosh ‘First Timer’ Waxes (A Little Too) Poetic On Experience - August 5th
http://www.aero-news.net/news/genav.cfm?ContentBlockID=477cfaf1-c88c-43e4-aa4f-3d8b71f164dd&Dynamic=1

A larger feature, published June 27, 2007 by ANN:

http://www.aero-news.net/news/featurestories.cfm?ContentBlockID=59eb9576-a7ad-4fc6-a895-6d882fa81ee8&Dynamic=1

‘Lost Squadron’ Pilot Recalls Ill-Fated WWII Flight
“We Really Believed We Would Get Off”
By ANN Correspondent Dave Ziegler

In July of 1942, six Lockheed P-38 Lightning fighters and two Boeing B-17 Flying Fortress bombers took off from the United States bound for Duxford, England as part of Operation Bolero, a mission to ferry aircraft across the Atlantic for deployment in the European Theater. Forced to turn around by bad weather, and with insufficient fuel to return home, the entire squadron was forced to land on a Greenland glacier.

Brad McManus, who at 89 is last surviving member of the famous “Lost Squadron,” was the first to land. “I was the youngest kid in the flight, and I elected right at that point I’m getting out of here, I got to get down while I have gas and power.” On landing, the nose wheel of his P-38 dug into the ice causing the aircraft to flip on its back, but McManus escaped with only minor injury.

McManus (shown above, left, with pilot Steve Hinton) recalled fellow pilot Harry Smith, who circled his overturned P-38 to check on him before landing himself. “He landed that airplane and turned the switches and stopped the propellers before he hit the ground so he landed … dead stick. He put it in with no power, which the rest of us were kind of shocked that he did that. But when you see the picture of the 38 sitting there on the ice, those propellers are absolutely straight.”

After landing one by one without major incident, the stranded airmen’s immediate concern turned to survival. “We slept in the B-17,” explained McManus. Despite the harsh environment and difficulties with their radio signals, he and the other airmen showed great courage and optimism. “When you’re young, you’re 23 or 24 years old, you don’t worry about the negatives. We really believed we would get off.”

The men stayed warm with improvised space heaters made from empty oxygen tanks and fueled by engine oil, and they kept their radio operating by removing the B-17’s damaged propeller blades so the engine could be run for power. Because of their ingenuity and determination, all 25 pilots and crew survived until ultimately being rescued several days later, but the aircraft were abandoned and later swallowed by the ice and snow.

The aircraft of the Lost Squadron remained trapped in ice for the next 50 years despite eleven attempts between 1977 and 1990 to recover them. Finally, on the twelfth attempt in 1992, J. Roy Shoffner and his team successfully recovered a single P-38F (above) buried in 268 feet of ice - the aircraft originally flown by Harry Smith.

Restoration of the P-38 began in January of 1993 and, after a cost of nearly $7 million, was flown as the rechristened Glacier Girl for the first time on October 26, 2002 by air show and movie pilot Steve Hinton. His experience flying vintage aircraft, along with his roles as owner of an aircraft restoration company and president of the Planes of Fame aviation museum, made Hinton a logical choice.

Bob Cardin, who spearheaded Glacier Girl’s recovery, and who was later hired to oversee its restoration, recalled a conversation he had with Shoffner back in May of 1992 as they struggled against the elements in Greenland. “Roy said, ‘Wouldn’t it be something if we were really able to recover this plane, and we got it flying and we could finish the mission that these planes were on back in 1942.’”

Shoffner’s dream is now becoming a reality, though sadly he did not live to see it having passed away on September 24, 2005. Thanks to the many dedicated individuals involved in the project, including its current owner, Texas businessman Rod Lewis, Glacier Girl is finally completing its 65 year old mission.

As ANN reported, on June 22 Hilton and Glacier Girl departed Teterboro Airport in New Jersey bound for Duxford as part of Operation Bolero II, following the same trans-Atlantic route as the original World War II mission. “This particular mission means an awful lot to me,” Hilton told ANN shortly before taking off. “This airplane brings so many human stories to light.”

Hilton is not alone. Flying alongside the legendary P-38 is veteran air show pilot Ed Shipley in the vintage North American P-51 Mustang, Miss Velma. Additionally, McManus joined Hilton and Shipley for the first few hundred miles of the mission, flying with pilot Jim Beasley. “I feel very, very strongly emotionally,” McManus said about Operation Bolero II. “It’s a great day. It’s a historic moment … in aviation history.”

McManus expressed his appreciation to those responsible for Glacier Girl’s rescuers. “I just want to add my vote of gratitude to the owner and to those that have suffered through the recovery of the plane, started in 1983 and was accomplished on the 15th of July in 1992.”

But it was those responsible for Glacier Girl and Operation Bolero II that felt they owed thanks to McManus and others. “It’s certainly not about the three of us up here,” Shipley explained. “It’s about Brad and all those who have gone before, and all those people that are serving around the world today.”

“It really makes me feel great … to be standing here with Brad, Steve, Rod, Ed, and all of you folks and saying wow, this is going to take place. This is really what it’s all about. It’s the real deal.”

Operation Bolero II is not without its dangers, as Hilton explained before leaving. “[T]here’s a high level of risk for this mission, but Rod Lewis has given us a lot of tools to try to do it as safe as we can. We have a modern chase plane. Rod himself is going to lead us there, flying a PC-12, he’ll have modern navigation equipment and survival gear if something goes awry.”

What’s in store for Glacier Girl after appearing at AirVenture this year is unclear, as the historic value of this extremely rare aircraft must be considered.

“I think we counted about 35 [surviving P-38s],” Hinton explains, “and that included every crash piece we could think of. There’s only three that fly right now. That’s it.” As of now, however, Glacier Girl is expected to remain flying after completing its mission - a fitting tribute to the many men who bravely flew these wondrous aircraft in World War II, and to all pilots who fly in service to their country.

FMI: http://www.thelostsquadron.com/

A reprint of my coverage of Operation Bolero II for Aero-News Network. The published article with photos can be found here.

Glacier Girl Embarks On Operation Bolero II
Sat, 23 Jun ‘07
Heads To England To Complete Original Mission
By ANN Correspondent Dave Ziegler

After 65 years — including 50 years spent buried deep below the surface of a Greenland glacier — the recovered and fully restored Lockheed P-38 now known as Glacier Girl is on her way to completing her interrupted World War II mission: Operation Bolero.

ANN was on hand as Glacier Girl departed Teterboro Airport in Teterboro, NJ around 1330 EDT Friday, as pilot Steve Hinton set out to follow the same transatlantic route the P-38 and the rest of the famous WWII “Lost Squadron” attempted in 1942. The entire squadron, which consisted of P-38s and Boeing B-17s, was forced to land on the ice after bad weather forced the aircraft to turn back despite insufficient fuel.

For Operation Bolero II, Glacier Girl is accompanied by veteran air show pilot Ed Shipley, who will fly the vintage North American P-51 Mustang, Miss Velma.

Flying alongside pilots Hinton and Shipley for the first 100 miles of their journey is 89 year-old Brad McManus, the last living pilot of the Lost Squadron. Before beginning his flight with pilot Jim Beasley, McManus talked with ANN about this venerable aircraft and the pilots who flew it.

“I’d like to acknowledge a relationship that this plane had with thousands of guys that flew it,” McManus (shown below, left) said. “It was, in my judgment, the most popular aircraft built in World War II. It had great range, great speed, great firepower. It was successful in the Pacific and in the Atlantic.”

After completing its mission by landing in Duxford, England, Glacier Girl will stay to participate in The Flying Legends Show July 7-8 before returning to appear at AirVenture Oshkosh 2007.

FMI: http://www.thelostsquadron.com/

Following A Dream

It’s 6:09 p.m. on June 7th, 2007, and here I sit at my computer, nervously watching the time and waiting for a call from Rob Finfrock, Managing Editor of Aero-News Network. You see, on May 24th, I heard an ANN Special Feature in which Mr. Finfrock put out a call for stringers (freelance journalists) for this year’s AirVenture in Oshkosh. Rob’s personal story about his start as a stringer set me off daydreaming for about an hour, but I ultimately dismissed the idea and went back to working.

The idea came back to haunt me days later, after hearing Pink Floyd’s Learning To Fly on the radio. I decided to write ANN and express my interest, providing my credentials (what scant few I have) along with examples of my writing, photography, and multimedia work.  I sent that email on June 1st, not really expecting a reply. But a reply did come only a week later, and a rather positive one at that.

I’m not sure what made me dismiss this opportunity so readily, other than some unhealthy self-doubt. Aside from my wife, I have three great loves: Aviation, writing, and photography. I’ve often thought of making a transition from my career in IT to one that would let me incorporate these interests, but I had no idea where to begin. This could be the start of that transition, or it could just be a great experience that I will remember and cherish forever. However it turns out, I am ready to tackle AirVenture with passion, pride, and determination.

What follows is my response to the following editorial:
http://www.westwoodone.com/pg/jsp/osgood/transcript.jsp?pid=14956

Dear Mr. Osgood:

I was deeply troubled and saddened by your April 16th commentary entitled “Guess Who’s Making Life Easier for Corporate Jet Setters?” Forgive me for being blunt, but your editorial, and the AP story it was based upon, had some serious flaws. Yes, I am a private pilot, but I am also a consumer of the airlines, and either way I travel I pay my fair share to support our country’s aviation infrastructure.

That brings me to the first problem I have with your story: The implication that airline passengers give corporate and private pilots a free ride when it comes to airport funding. The plain truth is that everyone who uses our air transportation system pays to support it. Airline passengers do pay a small tax per ticket, but you neglected to mention that corporations and private pilots pay a significant tax on aviation fuel. In addition, smaller General Aviation (GA) airports are funded by airport businesses (Fixed Base Operators) that pay rent as well as aircraft owners that pay hangar and tie-down fees.

Second, you imply that these airports offer little or no value to anyone other than corporate and private pilots. This is untrue; General Aviation airports serve the community in numerous ways:

They provide a means of transportation to areas not served by the airlines
They accommodate police, fire, medical, and emergency services aircraft
They accommodate mail, freight, traffic reporting,
and other vital public services
They provide emergency access during emergencies and disasters
They are the starting point for tomorrow’s pilots — including airline pilots

I urge you to visit the following sites, which better explain the funding for and value of General Aviation:

http://flighttraining.aopa.org/learntofly/overview/funding.cfm
http://www.gaservingamerica.com/
http://www.aopa.org/
If I can help you learn more about the necessity of General Aviation, please don’t hesitate to contact me.

Regards,

–Dave Ziegler

Airline Passenger,
Private Pilot,
Advanced Ground Instructor,
and FAA Safety Team Representative

A little piece of satire written in response to several recent news stories, including one about a minor taxi incident in which two airliners bumped wingtips. Aviation is under the news media’s microscope again, so it’s more important than ever to fly exactly and precisely.

Disaster was narrowly averted yesterday after a mix-up in one airliner’s galley resulted in some passengers being served decaffeinated coffee instead of regular, and regular instead of decaffeinated.

“We’re not sure how this happened,” said an unidentified FAA spokesperson. “We do have procedures in place to prevent this kind of thing, but somewhere we had a failure in the system and we’re investigating.”

The red-eye fight, which had just departed Liberty International in Newark, NJ and was bound for Los Angeles, was able to complete the trip without further incident.

“Some people are allergic to caffeine,” said Gloria Weinblatt, spokesperson for Air Travelers Advocacy Committee, “and conversely, there are those depending on coffee to carry them through meetings, family gatherings, or whatever they are flying to.”

The FAA has temporarily restricted coffee service on all flights pending further investigation. One source says that new regulations concerning beverage handling are imminent.

Dave Ziegler, aspiring reporter for The Onion

My phone has been ringing more than usual since the crash of a Cirrus SR20 into a residential high-rise along New York City’s East River. My family and friends want to know my take on the accident, and many have asked if I still think flying small planes is safe. I’m not surprised by their concern; it is understandable, though much of it stems from the media’s attempt to sensationalize the story.

The deaths of Yankees pitcher Corey Lidle and flight instructor Tyler Stanger are terribly sad and unfortunate. Both men were young with family and friends who loved them, and my thoughts and prayers go out to those who suffer their loss. However, because of the celebrity status of Lidle and the sensitivity of New Yorkers since 9/11, there has been a great deal of speculation, dramatic reporting, and political posturing concerning this accident. Because this is a subject near and dear to my heart, I’d like to set the records straight.

Aside from the horrific acts of terrorism perpetrated on September 11th, 2001, there have been ten fatal aircraft crashes in New York City since 1962. Of these ten, only six involved General Aviation (GA) aircraft. That is approximately one fatal GA accident in New York City every seven years. Compare this to fatal accidents involving any other mode of transportation (pedestrian, car, bus, subway, train, boat, etc.) and this number is infinitesimally small, regardless of how you look at the numbers or percentages.

So what about terrorism? Unlike passenger jets, such as those hijacked on September 11th, small planes make completely ineffective weapons. Most GA aircraft weigh less than an economy car, and can carry much less. Why would anyone spend time and money learning to fly a small plane for a terrorist mission when a cars, trucks, and boats are far more accessible and can do far greater damage?

No sane person would ever suggest banning land and sea vehicles in the name of safety, but lately there has been talk about greatly restricting aircraft operation in the New York City area despite safety records and lack of damage potential (if you don’t know what I mean about lack of damage potential, just look at the very minor damage caused by the crash). That is why I urge everyone to learn the facts about General Aviation, including why it’s safe and why it’s vital:

http://blogs.usatoday.com/oped/2006/10/post_12.html

http://www.gaservingamerica.com/

Like many other flight sim fans, I’ve eagerly awaited the release of Flight Simulator X since Microsoft announced the upcoming product earlier this year. In fact, the morning FSX hit the shelves I found myself pacing impatiently in front of my local software store waiting for it to open. Oddly enough, I was the only one standing there in the rain, and I didn’t even have to run to the rack and fight for my copy.
 
Bugs Belong On The Windshielf, Not In The Code

I was fairly impressed by the pre-release trial of FSX despite its bugs and poor performance (that’s to be expected from any beta product). The production version of the trial addressed some of these issues, but enough problems remained to make me worry about the upcoming release. Sadly, my worry was justified — there are still numerous bugs, glitches, and performance issues yet to be resolved.

The first glitch I experienced occurred immediately after starting FSX, during a canned demo: With a computer-controlled aircraft flying high over the mountains and a narrator boasting about new features, I received the familiar Splash! message normally reserved for contact with water. Apparently, one of the new features is the ability to crash into water at 10,000 feet ASL. The demo ended abruptly and restarted.

I experienced another glitch selecting an aircraft during free flight setup. While the aircraft rotated on the configuration screen, the previous frames would not clear, leaving an almost psychedelic trail of ghost images. And later, while cycling aircraft views in flight, the landscape became a mangled mess: colors became washed out, trees sprung out of the water, and many buildings became either half buried or found themselves floating in the air. It took at least a minute for the world to sort itself out.

Stunning Eye Candy If You Can Afford It

For those who love eye candy, FSX promised to deliver the goods. I drooled over early screenshots and couldn’t wait for the more realistic VFR experience they promised. The good news is that the screen shots were real. The bad news is that even on my relatively high-end system, it felt as though I was flying in a stop-motion film. By the time I turned down the display settings enough to achieve an acceptable frame rate (with everything set to low or moderately low), the graphics were only moderately improved over Flight Simulator 2004.

The virtual 3D panels, already wonderfully detailed in Flight Simulator 2004, are greatly improved and are now the default panel view. There is a performance hit, however, so I found myself returning to the 2D panels for IFR flight.

Missions

Before trying FSX’s new mission mode of play, I was skeptical about this very game-like feature. While those not interested in real world aviation might find flight simulators boring without a little extra drama and action thrown in, I never had a problem creating adventures in my head. I have to admit, though, that I’ve been suckered into the missions.

Not to give anything away, I’ll just say that my first mission should have been a nice, uneventful VFR flight to take in the new scenery. Just when I started to get comfortable, I found myself declaring an emergency that felt eerily real. I’m happy to report that my virtual passenger and I walked away from my hard deadstick landing with only a virtual collapsed nosewheel and in need of a virtual drink.

While I’ve found several of the missions to be entertaining, they are very “canned” and any variation from the plot can totally destroy the illusion. Another result of this tight scripting is that playing the same mission over and over can become repetitive. Finally, the voice acting is not always realistic or convincing (and for one mission in which you fly a Piper Cub to a nearby fly-in, the voice is terribly creepy, almost like having Hannibal Lector as your co-pilot).

Aircraft

Rather than go into the list of aircraft, which is readily accessible from various on-line sources, I’ll just say that I am satisfied with the selection. Some of the classic and historic aircraft found in Flight Simulator 2004 are gone, replaced with newer models that just make more sense. Still, I’ll keep the previous version installed for those times I feel like flying a Ford Trimotor or the Wright Flyer.

Conclusion

If my review seems overly negative, perhaps it’s the months of anticipation combined with a more positive experience with past releases. I’m confident that Microsoft will address many of these bugs with future patches, and with technology continuously evolving, newer systems will likely be able to satisfy this version’s voracious appetite. Also, I have not explored all of the new features of FSX, such as improved multi-player capability, which no doubt add great value to the product.

Older Posts »